Lilypie Maternity tickers

Lilypie Maternity tickers

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

How Do You Believe You Are Saved?

"Crucifixion" by Thomas Eakin

Yesterday, I received the following question:

Just out of curiosity..., how do you believe you are saved for eternal life & freedom from sin? As a very conservative Protestant, I believe in Eph. 2:8-9, among other verses. How do you reconcile salvation by works to these verses?

Besides the question about prayer to the saints that I addressed in yesterday's post, this is probably the most common question Catholics receive from other Christians. It is also the question around which the most powerful contentions have arisen between the Christian denominations--Catholic or otherwise. Presbyterians argue about it with Baptists, Baptists argue about it with Orthodox Christians, Orthodox Christians argue about it with Methodists...and on and on and on.

Interestingly enough, despite all this bickering and debate, all Christians actually agree on how we are saved. We are saved by grace. Scripture tells us this repeatedly, and there is no Christian denomination, to my knowledge, that holds any other belief than this: that we are saved by grace, alone.

"We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved..." (Acts 15:11)

"...it is by grace you have been saved" (Ephesians 2:5)

"For it is by grace you have been saved..." (Ephesians 2:8)

"So do not be ashamed to testify about our Lord, or ashamed of me his prisoner. But join with me in suffering for the gospel, by the power of God, who has saved us and called us to a holy life—not because of anything we have done but because of his own purpose and grace. This grace was given us in Christ Jesus before the beginning of time, but it has now been revealed through the appearing of our Savior, Christ Jesus, who has destroyed death and has brought life and immortality to light through the gospel." (2 Timothy 1:8-10)

What is grace? It is the free gift of God's mercy. It is not deserved. It cannot be earned. There is nothing we can do to obtain it. Our works do not buy us this salvific grace. Nor is it earned through faith or profession of faith. It is given freely. It belongs to God, and he gives it to us as a gift. This is how every Christian receives salvation: by grace alone.

If Christians can agree on the fact that we are saved by grace, where we differ dramatically is in our understanding of how we are "justified." Some people have asserted that justification refers to how we are assured of salvation. This concept is utterly foreign to Catholics who do not speak of "assurance of salvation" but rather "hope of salvation" (Psalm 119:81, 1 Thessalonians 5:8) and of working out our salvation (Phillipians 2:12). For Catholics, salvation is granted by grace, but the process of living out that salvation is an ongoing process that God is working, in combination with the free will of man, in every Christian soul throughout his or her life and possibly continuing into death in purgatory. (Forgive me, but I think I'll leave discussion of purgatory for another day.) Protestants call this ongoing work sanctification and claim that it is done through works. For Catholics, the Protestant concepts of sanctification and justification are both addressed in the doctrine of justification.

Boy, that makes my head spin. To put it more simply: the Catholic doctrine of justification "denotes the transforming of the sinner from the state of unrighteousness to the state of holiness and sonship of God" (newadvent.org). Justification is considered both as an act--of God, carried out in conjunction with the free will of the Christian person--and as a state or habit, denoting "the continued possession of a quality inherent in the soul, which theologians aptly term sanctifying grace" (Ibid). As an act, Catholic justification may be compared to Protestant sanctification. As a state, justification may be considered to denote the same thing in both traditions.

This is why Catholics speak of being justified through faith and works. We never speak of being saved by either faith or works. Such a claim would be unbiblical and against the teaching of the Church.

Protestants often use the verses referred to in the original question as a proof text against justification through works. Let's take a look at the passage together (I will use the NIV translation):

"But because of his great love for us, God, who is rich in mercy, made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in transgressions—it is by grace you have been saved. And God raised us up with Christ and seated us with him in the heavenly realms in Christ Jesus, in order that in the coming ages he might show the incomparable riches of his grace, expressed in his kindness to us in Christ Jesus. For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— not by works, so that no one can boast" (Ephesians 2:4-9).

What are we dealing with here? The first few verses tell us that we are saved by grace. We have already addressed this point. I would encourage some of my Protestant brothers and sisters to consider this very closely: We are saved by grace, not by faith. Not even our faith can buy us salvific grace; it is purely a gift from God. I have encountered many non-Catholic Christians, even some ordained ministers, who merely pay lip service to the doctrine of salvation by grace but in reality, they are preaching salvation by faith. This is not Biblical.

Moving on to verses 8 and 9, we find the key text that Protestants have used for the past five centuries to argue against justifcation through works. "For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith--and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God--not by works, so that no one can boast." This is pretty convincing stuff, and if this were all that Scripture had to say on the matter, we might consider the Protestant doctrine to be correct. However, the problem with proof texts is that they are taken alone, out of the larger context of Scripture. Catholic teaching has always been careful to avoid the pitfalls of using such strategies when studying Scripture. We must consider Ephesians 2:8-9 in the greater context of the Bible.

Interestingly enough, we get a clue from the very next verse, which the proof-texters all too often stop before reaching: "For we are God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do" (Ephesians 2:10, emphasis my own). How do we understand Ephesians 2:8-9 when coupled with verse 10? We are saved by the free gift of God's grace. Through our faith (which is also a gift from God), we are justified. St. Paul makes it clear that we are not saved by works, or the Law, because we cannot earn salvation. Salvation is a gift. Faith is a gift. Work has to do with us. Salvation is from God, and not from us. Yet, in verse 10, we see that we were "created in Christ Jesus to do good works"--we are saved to do good works. Works are never separate from faith, but they are not a means to obtain salvation. We understand this more fully in conjunction with Romans 11:5-6, which says, "So too, at the present time there is a remnant chosen by grace. And if by grace, then it is no longer by works; if it were, grace would no longer be grace." This is the point St. Paul is making in this section of the Book of Ephesians: not that faith is more important than works or that we are justified by faith alone, but that we are saved by grace alone, rather than by works, which was the previous understanding, according to the Jewish tradition.

The Book of James has a lot to say about the relationship between faith and works. Incidentally, when Martin Luther was compiling his own canon of Scripture, which differs in several significant ways from the Catholic Bible, he very nearly got rid of the Book of James because of this exact issue. I will quote at length from the epistle so that we can see that this was a very important issue in the early church, just as it remains today:

"What good is it, my brothers, if a man claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save him? Suppose a brother or sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to him, 'Go, I wish you well; keep warm and well fed,' but does nothing about his physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.

But someone will say, 'You have faith; I have deeds.' Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by what I do.
You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that—and shudder.

You foolish man, do you want evidence that faith without deeds is useless? Was not our ancestor Abraham considered righteous for what he did when he offered his son Isaac on the altar? You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did. And the scripture was fulfilled that says, 'Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness,' and he was called God's friend. You see that a person is justified by what he does and not by faith alone.

In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction? As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead" (James 2:14-26, emphasis my own).

James is very clear on this point, particularly in verse 24: A Christian "is justified by what he does and not by faith alone." Can there be any dispute over this? Clearly, there is, or Sola Fide, justification by "faith alone" would not be one of the two pillars of the Protestant Reformation (the other pillar being Sola Scriptura or "Scripture alone") and of all that followed. Yet, I fail to understand how such claims can be made in light of what Scripture so clearly says about justification, particularly by those who claim Sola Scriptura.

We know, not only from James 2:19 but from the Gospel accounts that faith is not enough. Consider Matthew 7:21-23:

"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?' Then I will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!'"

Professing Jesus as Lord, even performing miracles in His name is not enough. Only those who do the Father's will will be permitted to enter heaven.

Mark 1:34 tells us that Jesus would not allow the demons He drove out of the sufferring to speak because "they knew who He was." Shockingly, the demon Legion who possessed a man whom Jesus healed addressed the Messiah by name when He approached the possessed man: "When he saw Jesus, he cried out and fell at his feet, shouting at the top of his voice, 'What do you want with me, Jesus, Son of the Most High God? I beg you, don't torture me!'" (Luke 8:28). These demons knew Jesus. Legion proclaims Him to be the Son of God. Yet, they are not justified; they are not saved. Of course, they are also not human, but the fact remains, as St. James says in his epistle: belief, which is a gift from God anyway, is not enough!

This topic is so immense, I'm sure I could go on for pages and pages in responding to the question at the top of this post. Countless books have been written on this subject. The bloody battles of the Reformation were fought, in part, over it. Today, we encounter brokenness in the Body of Christ, and it is at least partially due to this point. Greater scholars and holier men and women than I have addressed it from both sides. But, I hope I have done some justice to this important doctrine and that I have clarified some misconceptions about what Catholics believe regarding salvation and justification.

13 comments:

  1. This actually helps a lot, thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hmm. This is interesting, but may I point out one thing? I am a Protestant, and therefore believe in justification AND sanctification, but don't believe that sanctification is through works. Rather, I believe that sanctification is God working through us, making us more like him, but apart from the Holy Spirit and God's grace, I would be able to do nothing. Just my thoughts.

    Very interesting post.

    GHE

    ReplyDelete
  3. GHE - Catholics also believe that our good works are made possible by God working through us. I think we may put a little more of a stress on the shared responsbility of man's will in conjunction with the power of the Holy Spirit than our Protestant (or at least Reformed) brothers and sisters. Thank you for your comment, as I realize I had failed to address this in my post.
    ~Bethany

    ReplyDelete
  4. Would it be an accurate guess that purgatory plays into this issue rather strongly? It IS just a guess, as I am almost entirely unfamiliar with actual Catholic doctrine. The reason I ask - if salvation is found through grace alone, but justification is found through works (doing the will of God), what happens when you have someone who is saved, but who later turns away and fails to do the will of God? According to Catholicism, can a person lose their salvation, by failing to become justified - by walking away, for whatever reason? I am not saying that you said this, by the way, I just felt that it was not addressed.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Alena- It actually has more to do with the difference between venial and mortal sin. I've written a post on that here: http://applecidermama.blogspot.com/2009/03/are-all-sins-created-equal.html. Basically, we are called to do good (remember Jesus separating the sheep from the goats in the Gospel), and we are called not to sin. Well, of course, we all sin, so in that way, none of us could be justified if all sins were equal. For Catholics (and Jews and many other faiths), all sins are not equal. We have what are called venial (minor) sins and mortal (grave) sins. Check out the post, and I think it will make more sense for you. I've also written a post on Purgatory, if you're interested.http://applecidermama.blogspot.com/2009/03/purgatory.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. I am here as a guest. Please do not be afraid to kick me out if I am disrespectful, offend you, or for any other reason.

    After studying the posts:
    Are All Sins Created Equal
    Purgatory

    as well as this article:
    http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08573a.htm
    I am curious if the impression of Reformed / Protestant justification given in the above article is the same as yours.

    and portions of this copy of the catechism:
    http://www.scborremeo.org/ccc/ccc_toc.htm

    I'm still a little confused about the relationship between justification (Catholic), Purgatory, confession, and communion.

    Under the Reformed view of justification, sin is viewed as a "debt to God. This debt was paid, each sin individually, past present and future. If a Christian dies, there is no need for Purgatory because all of their sins are clean, regardless of whether they confessed before dying.

    Therefore, I am having trouble figuring out why Christians under Catholic justification need to confess each individual sin, venial ones to avoid purgatory and mortal ones to avoid hell. I still understand the need to confess in general. This is necessary because it is commanded and we need to maintain fellowship with God.
    This is the point of Jesus washing the disciple's feet in John 13:10.


    There seem to be some misunderstandings about our beliefs of Sola Scriptura and Sola Fide.

    Sola Fide means that a Christian does not bring anything to merit his salvation (except his sinful nature which makes it necessary). This is why we can state both Sola Fide and Sola Gracia. This is "so that no one can boast". The additional works which someone produces after becoming a Christian are seen as symptoms, not the cure. By claiming that they are part of the cure, it looks like they are a contradiction with Sola Fide (and Sola Gracia). Meanwhile, if someone does not have the symptoms of salvation, it is obvious that they were not really saved, or cured, to begin with. I'm still trying to figure out what the practical differences between our views are here.

    As far as Sola Scriptura goes, lacking a "reference" in scripture does not fail a doctrine. Indeed, the Reformed doctrine of limited atonement has very little "direct" support in scripture. However, it needed to be defined in response to heresies and has "indirect" support from the other directly supported doctrines of Reformed theology. In the same way, Purgatory does not need a "direct" reference if it is supported by other doctrines. Rather, contradiction? inconsistency? with other doctrines based on clearly written, directly supporting verses seems to be the main point of criticism from the Reformed / Protestant point of view from Sola Scriptura.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bryan- Don't worry; you're being very respectful. I appreciate your thoughtful questions, and I will do my best to answer them.

    Let's start with sin. You said, for Reformed Protestants, sin is considered a "debt to God" that has been paid for (in the case of believers) by Christ's blood. Catholics do not view sin this way. We see sin both as a sign of the Fall (Original Sin), which is washed away in Baptism--by virtue of Christ's Blood--but it is also something that we can choose to do (mortal or venial) throughout our lives, even after the washing with water at Baptism. These sins, also, demand reparation. Except in the case of mortal sin, which separates us in a profound way from God, this sin has nothing to do with our salvation. The need for confession and Purgatory is not to save our souls, but to complete the work of making our souls holy, as God is holy, so that we may one day be with Him in fullness, for Scripture tells us that nothing unholy can ever be near to Him.

    A lot of these difference have to do with the doctrine of total depravity. Calvinists (Reformed Protestants), as you know, believe that we are totally depraved and incapable of doing any good work apart from God. Catholics do not believe that. We believe that, compared with God's holiness, we are as nothing and completely unworthy of His grace and love, but we understand that we are all born with Original sin and have a tendency toward sin, but we do not believe in total depravity. We believe sin is something we are all tempted to, but also something that we can CHOOSE to do or not. We can also CHOOSE to do good. We believe that the Spirit of God works in us to help us turn from sin and to do good. But, we do not believe that we are totally depraved.

    Next, let me address "the relationships between Catholic justification, Purgatory, Confession, and Communion" that you spoke of. Hm...actually, first we need to talk a bit more about justification.

    Protestants (Reformed, at least) believe in Fiduciary Faith. They speak of being saved by grace and justified by faith. By "faith" they mean, faith that Jesus Christ atoned for our sins. This "faith" is how they can know that they are saved. This is not what Catholics mean when they say we are justified by "faith and works." We do not mean that we know we are saved because we have faith in Jesus and do good works. In fact, Catholics don't really speak of "knowing" about our salvation at all. We speak of TRUSTING and HOPING regarding our salvation. So, when we say we are saved by grace, that's pretty straightforward. When we say we are justified by faith, we mean that we have reason to trust and hope in our salvation because we have FAITH IN GOD'S GOODNESS and ABILITY and DESIRE to save us. When we say we are justified by works, we mean that these good works of the Spirit in us are another reason to hope: a sign of God's faithfulness in making us more like Him and ready to dwell with Him.

    Now, regarding works: by doing good works and avoiding evil ones, we are shortening our time in Purgatory (racking up fewer sins in the first place; doing good deeds to make reparation for the sins we do commit). So, that's the relationship with Purgatory. It has nothing to do with justification, but the works by which we are justified does have something to do with Purgatory.

    Now, confession. Technically, Catholics only have to go to Confession when they have committed a mortal sin, in order to set themselves in good standing with God and with His Bride, the Church. However, we believe the grace offered in Confession also helps us to avoid the temptation to sin in the future, so most of us choose to go even regarding venial sins, and particularly regarding those sins which are habitual in our lives. In this way, it has some relationship to Purgatory, but not to justification.

    (to be cont'd)

    ReplyDelete
  8. (part II)
    Regarding Holy Communion: A Catholic MUST go to confess a mortal sin before receiving Holy Communion. Scripture tells us that no one may eat the bread and drink the wine unworthily without eating and drinking judgment on himself. In this way, it relates to Confession. We also know that reception of the Eucharist--by receiving Christ Himself, through God's grace--we are strengthened in our journey as Christians; we are also cleansed of venial sins in the celebration of the Mass and Communion. But, there is not really a direct correlation to Justification or to Purgatory, just to sin and the Christian journey in general.

    Let me reiterate, that we don't just "confess before dying." We are encouraged to seek sacramental confession throughout our lives, not as a "get out of Hell free card," but in order to lead holier lives to God's glory! A deathbed confession would free one from the damnation of mortal sin, if one is in such a state, but it is much better to do this long, long before. A deathbed confession also does not get you out of Purgatory. Your salvation (if you are saved) has already been secured by virtue of Christ's sacrifice. Still, Catholics believe that reparation must be made for earthly sin. This is why souls go to Purgatory, to be "purged" or "cleansed" in order to complete the work of being made holy before they go to dwell in Heaven. This is also why Catholics pray for the souls of the recently departed faithful. We are helping them to make reparation with our prayers and speeding their reception into Heaven.

    So, confession does NOT help a Christian to avoid Purgatory. Confession (in the instance of mortal sin) helps a Christian to avoid HELL, and it can help one to sin less often, thus shortening time in Purgatory. But, Confession puts us in right standing with God, expiating any eternal punishment for mortal sin. It does not expiate temporal punishment, which is incurred by all sin, even venial sin. This is dealt with through penance (prayers, fasts, etc.) and, after death, through time in Purgatory.

    There seem to be some misunderstandings about our beliefs of Sola Scriptura and Sola Fide.

    In speaking of Sola Fide, you say that "additional works which someone produces after becoming a Christian are seen as symptoms, not the cure." This is how Catholics also view faith. Our faith does not save us. Only God's grace saves us. Faith and works are the "symptoms" as you put it, of being saved. You see, for Catholics, we see "Sola Fide" as a boast. Even if you say that faith is an unmeritted gift (which we also believe) to claim that it has anything to do with salvation is wrong, in our estimation. All salvation is granted by unmeritted GRACE alone. Faith is a gift of the saved.

    We do not believe in Sola Scriptura, because even Scripture itself is given through Sacred Tradition (the Church decided what books were Scripture to begin with.) Besides which, we all have a lense through which we view Scripture (culture, language, religious background, etc.), which is why so many well-meaning, studied Christians have come to such different interpretations of Scripture through the past two millenia. Catholics use the lense of Sacred Tradition through which to understand Scripture (those things which were passed down from the Apostles themselves--the lense through which Jesus' closest friends and first advocates viewed Scripture.) This is why we have a cohesive faith across hundreds of cultures, languages, and centuries. To say we believe in Scripture alone means little, for us. We believe fully in Scripture, but we also believe in an interpretation of that Scripture in its fullness, and for this, we need Tradition.

    Anyway, hope that helps. God bless!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank you very much! This helps out a lot.

    I think we have the same concept of Sola Fide. Faith is a boast unless it comes only from God.

    What works does the sacred tradition include? The Apocrypha? Anything else?

    Reformed Christians also use the works of respected Christians to interpret scripture. The difference is that scripture is still authoritative over them. I'm guessing this would be analogous to using Precedent to interpret the US Constitution and the US Constitution having authority over precedent? Or is this going too far?

    When Calvinists say that we cannot perform any good work apart from God, they mean that we cannot show God's glory through our actions, as all of their actions, even good ones, are corrupted by sin. God's glory will be shown regardless, through his own good character. We also mean that man cannot come to God on his own, but needs God to bring him to him.

    Your idea that we can still choose to do good might be covered under common grace. This is the idea that people can freely do good deeds to each other, even apart from God. Common Grace is still given by God, and sinners are still under total depravity. The idea of free will under total depravity is that man's actions are bounded by his nature. He can freely do good deeds under common grace, but he will continue to sin as is his nature.

    I'm guessing our main difference here on total depravity is that Catholic's believe we need to pay temporal punishments for sin, while Reformed Christians believe any payment of sin on our part is impossible?

    Some things I find odd as a Reformed Christian:
    You do not have certainty of salvation?

    Christ's sacrifice cleared eternal punishment but not temporal punishment? How can we pay for any sin at all? Doesn't this allow boasting? As far as I can tell, you see this payment as God's good works through you, but it's still strange.

    Did you say baptism washes away original sin (through Christ)? We see original sin as a purely symbolic declaration of becoming a Christian.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Bryan- Yes, the Apocrypha (which we don't call that) would be included in Tradition, among other things. Here is a link by Mark Shea, an excellent Catholic theologian who happens to attend my parish, on the subject: http://www.mark-shea.com/tradition.html

    Catholics believe that Christ's blood atoned for all sin. But, it didn't repudiate the need for punishment for sin, it's natural consequence. It made forgiveness possible, as the ultimate sacrifice. But, it did not mean that we don't still throw things supernaturally out-of-balance, as it were, by sinning. We still need to seek forgiveness, and we still need to freely participate with the work of the Spirit in us to become holy as God Himself is holy.

    We do not have certainty of salvation because we do not believe in eternal security or "once saved, always saved." We believe that salvation is a process, which God offers to all through His unmeritted grace. Some of us take it; some of us don't. Some of us continue in it; some of us don't. We don't need to "do" anything to keep it, but we can "do" something to reject it, just has we had to "do" something to accept it.

    And finally, you come to a heart difference between Catholics and Calvinists: symbolism. For us, Original Sin is REAL, not a symbol, and Baptism REALLY washes us clean; it doesn't merely, as Luther put it, cover up our sins (a snow-covered dung heep, he said). We believe Baptism really and truly wipes us clean of any stain of sin. We believe that Confession washes us clean as well and heals the wounds of mortal sin--Purgatory and other reparation does the work of healing the spiritual "scars", as it were. The cleansing of Original Sin in Baptism, by washing of the water and Blood, is a very important reason why Catholics cannot believe in depravity. We believe that we are cleansed of our Original Sin, and now we must persevere in the Christian life, through the Spirit dwelling in us, to avoid sin and to do good.

    Hope that helps,
    Bethany

    ReplyDelete
  11. You think we believe Original Sin is symbolic? Where did that come from?

    Sure, we believe that communion and baptism are symbolic, but the washing clean of sin is real. Meanwhile, we will continue to sin until we die.

    If baptism really washes you clean, what about the thief on the cross? Did he get a free pass out of baptism, communion, and purgatory because he talked to Jesus? What about everyone else who becomes saved on their deathbed?

    If you can lose your salvation, do you not believe that Christians have died to sin (Romans 6:2) and are new creatures (2 Corinthians 5:17)? Or are we born back in sin when we leave Christianity?

    According to the Mark Shea article, you believe that some people hold the same apostolic authority today as the original apostles?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Bryan- I DIDN'T think that Calvinists thought Original Sin was symbolic until you said that in your previous comment.

    We believe that there are "ordinary ways" in which the faithful are called to live their walk (such as receiving the sacraments), but God is not bound to these laws. He can work outside of them; the Church is not meant to, however.

    We believe what Romans says about sin. But anyone can fall into apostasy and walk away from the Church. Paul speaks of that possibility elsewhere. Once a Christian, always a Christian. But, being a member of the Church does not guarantee your salvation. You can be Baptized as an infant, cleansed from original sin, and then never follow the faith. You can follow the faith for years, then turn your back on it. Every Christian has seen this happen. It is horrible, but it happens.

    Yes, we believe that apostolic authority has been passed on. This is a big difference between the Orthodox churches and the Protestant ones. But, I'm not going to be able to get into all that here. Perhaps another post, someday.

    God bless.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Oops, I meant baptism there. Baptism is the symbolic declaration of becoming a Christian. Thank you for pointing that out.

    So the thief on the cross was instantly sanctified through means which Jesus used specifically there and may work in other believers as well.

    Do you believe that Christians can reach complete sanctification before they die? (so that they don't go to purgatory at all) Did this happen to the thief on the cross or is that different?

    If so, did Paul ever reach this point after writing Romans 7:14-25? Was that just talking about life before salvation? How do you handle 1 John 1:8,10?

    So, to you, being a Christian does not necessarily mean that you are going to heaven? It just means that you are the new creature? And the new creature is someone that is opened to the sanctifying power of God rather than someone who walks in the light? (1 John 1:7) What about 1 John 3:8-9, that he who practices sin is born of the devil and not of God?

    ReplyDelete

If you have questions, words of blessing or encouragement, or simply want to say, "Hello," you are more than welcome to share here. I do ask visitors to respect this as a place of peace, not dispute. Please refrain from posting any ungracious comments. Thank you.

Comments are open, though I reserve the right to moderate or delete at my discretion. If you post anonymously, please identify yourself in some way (initials, pseudonymn, etc.) so that I can address you specifically, as there are often multiple anonymous posters on any given comment thread.

I do so look forward to sharing with you all and, God willing, meeting some new friends. May the peace of Christ be with you all.