
Now that we've talked a bit about what Purgatory is, let's take a look at what Scripture says on the subject. Remember what I said earlier, however. There is no explicit or overt mention of Purgatory in Scripture; just as there is no explicit or overt mention of the Trinity. It is because of Sacred Tradition that we are able to discern mention of Purgatory in the Bible, similar to how we are able to understand many of the prophesies in the Old Testament about Jesus in light of His Death and Resurrection.
In Ecclesiastes 12:14, we are reminded that no deed will go unaccounted for: "For God will bring every deed into judgment, including every hidden thing, whether it is good or evil." This drives home the point that reparation will need to be made for our sins, whether through good deeds or by acts of penance and sacrifice. In 2 Corinthians 5:10, we read, "For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may receive what is due him for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad."
Because of this necessary judgment, we are admonished to be sanctified:
"Since we have these promises, dear friends, let us purify ourselves from everything that contaminates body and spirit, perfecting holiness out of reverence for God." (2 Corinthians 7:1)
Our goal is to complete reparation and perfect our sanctification in this life so that we may be immediately united with God upon death.
Let me repeat Hebrews 12:14: "Make every effort to live in peace with all men and to be holy; without holiness no one will see the Lord" (emphasis my own). This is a vital point. Unless we are holy, we cannot be with God. This is one reason why God appears to Moses only in the burning bush or with His back to him; if Moses were to look fully upon the Lord, being unholy, he would perish. If this is true of Moses, how much more so for us? Revelation 21:27 further drives this point home: "Nothing impure will ever enter it [Heaven], nor will anyone who does what is shameful or deceitful, but only those whose names are written in the Lamb's book of life" (emphasis my own).
"Do not gloat over me, my enemy! Though I have fallen, I will rise. Though I sit in darkness, the LORD will be my light. Because I have sinned against him, I will bear the LORD's wrath, until he pleads my case and establishes my right. He will bring me out into the light; I will see his righteousness." (Micah 7:8-9)
We see from these verses how Scripture is insistent that all deeds will be accounted for, that reparation for all sins will need to be made, and also that nothing impure or unholy may be united with God. But does that necessarily mean there must be a Purgatory? Doesn't Christ's atonement cover all our iniquities? Let us consider Jesus for a moment. Malachi 3:1-4 speaks to us of the coming Messiah as a "refiner":
To me, this passage, in particular, very clearly refers to Purgatory. A place where the deeds of those who already have their foundation in Christ are tested and revealed through God's refining fire. Such refining will result in "loss" if we have attached ourselves too much to the things of this world because we will need to be stripped of those things, yet we will be saved "as one escaping through the flames." Hebrews 12:19 tells us that "our 'God is a consuming fire.'" He is our purifier, our Holy Fire.
But, is Purgatory a real place, distinct from Heaven and Hell? If you've read Dante, you'll probably think that this is the orthodox understanding of Purgatory, and it was a prevailing conception of Purgatory in the past, particularly in the Middle Ages. It is drawn from passages like Philippians 2:10-11, which says "that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father." The thought was that Heaven was a real place located above the earth and Purgatory and Hell were real places located below the earth, but this conception of Purgatory is no longer the orthodox viewpoint. At an audience on August 4, 1999 Pope John Paul II said that Purgatory did not indicate a place, but "a condition of existence."
Though Purgatory may not be a real destination that we could map out in the cosmos, it is a very real "condition of existence." In many passages of Scripture, Jesus speaks of "Gehenna"; in Protestant Bibles this word is translated "Hell" or "grave" or "fire." In Catholic translations, it is left untranslated as "Gehenna." In order to understand the importance of this word, we must consider the Jewish understanding of it. For the Jews, Gehenna was a place of purification where sinners were thought to spend approximately one year before release. This is the understanding that Jesus had when He used the term in speaking with His disciples. Now, let's take a look at how the differences in translation may either show Gehenna to support the dogma of Purgatory in Scripture or not. I will use Matthew 5:29-30 to illustrate this point:
The NIV translation (arguably the most popular modern English translation among Protestants) of these verses can be read thus:
"If your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell" (emphasis my own).
Look at the difference in the NAB (New American Bible), a Catholic English translation:
"If your right eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one of your members than to have your whole body thrown into Gehenna. And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one of your members than to have your whole body go into Gehenna" (emphasis my own).
The NIV translation speaks of eternal punishment in Hell. The NAB speaks of temporal punishment in a purgatorial place or state, Gehenna. Consider the context from which these verses are drawn: Jesus is challenging His disciples not only to avoid mortal sins (such as adultery) but lesser manifestations of the same sinful roots (such as looking at a woman lustfully), which might easily lead to mortal sin. Since Christ is speaking, here, about venial sins, rather than mortal sins, it makes sense that He would be speaking about a place of corresponding temporary punishment rather than one of eternal punishment.
The final mention of Purgatory in Scripture that I would like to point to is one that most of my Protestant readers will dismiss, because it comes from the Book of 2 Maccabees. 2 Maccabees is a part of deuterocanonical Scripture, which is present in the Catholic Bible but absent in Protestant Bibles, unless it is tacked on as an appendix under the heading of "Apocrypha." A part of the Septuagint, Catholics hold that 1 and 2 Maccabees are a part of Sacred Scripture. After the Protestant Reformation, Protestants decided to use the Jewish canon that was codified sometime between the years 200 BC and 200 AD, rather than the Septuagint in forming their canon of the Old Testament. It is thought that this decision weighed heavily on the Protestant aversion to some doctrinal innovations, such as that in 2 Maccabees on the efficacy of prayers for the dead, which is discussed in the passage below. Prayer for the dead is a clear support of Purgatory. If there were not souls that were continuing to be refined in death, why would the deceased need our prayers? Yet, if Purgatory is real, then prayer for the dead makes perfect sense: those of us still journeying on earth may pray for our departed brothers and sisters, that their sufferings in Purgatory may be shortened and their entrance into full communion with God hastened.
Here is the passage from 2 Maccabees 12:39-46, which takes place following a battle between the Jews and the forces of Gorgias, governor of Idumea, after the Feast of Weeks, or Pentecost, in which "a few of the Jews were slain" (2 Maccabees 12:32-34).:
"On the following day, since the task had now become urgent, Judas and his men went to gather up the bodies of the slain and bury them with their kinsmen in their ancestral tombs. But under the tunic of each of the dead they found amulets sacred to the idols of Jamnia, which the law forbids the Jews to wear. So it was clear to all that this was why these men had been slain. They all therefore praised the ways of the Lord, the just judge who brings to light the things that are hidden. Turning to supplication, they prayed that the sinful deed might be fully blotted out. The noble Judas warned the soldiers to keep themselves free from sin, for they had seen with their own eyes what had happened because of the sin of those who had fallen. He then took up a collection among all his soldiers, amounting to two thousand silver crachmas, which he sent to Jerusalem to provide for an expiatory sacrifice. In doing this he acted in a very excellent and noble way, inasmuch as he had the resurrection of the dead in view; for if he were not expecting the fallen to rise again, it would have been useless and foolish to pray for them in death. But if he did this with a view to the splendid reward that awaits those who had gone to rest in godliness, it was a holy and pious thought. Thus he made atonement for the dead that they might be freed from this sin" (emphasis my own).So, we've discussed what Purgatory is, and we've looked at what Scripture has to say about it. We've talked about the necessity for complete purification, and we've considered how Purgatory enables that purification. We've talked about the major barriers that many Protestants have in understanding and accepting a belief in Purgatory, namely the two pillar doctrines of sola Scriptura and sola fide. I hope I have helped to shed some light on the Catholic understanding of Purgatory and why it is important to us. I do not intend, and neither does the Church, for this doctrine to frighten or guilt anyone. Rather, I hope it will exhort us all to lead better lives here on earth and to pray for the repose of the souls of our departed brother and sisters, that they may be sped on their way to Eternal Joy in Heaven.

Bethany, thank you for all your wonderful posts. This one has brought many questions and frankly, disagreements to my mind. I respect your faith (it's also the faith of my beloved in-laws who are as genuinely faithful as you are). What I'd most like to hear about, from your perspective as a Catholic, is a response to this: As a Protestant, does my confession of sin to God independent of a priest (excepting my High Priest in heaven Christ Jesus- and to me that's no small exception) properly atone for sin, or will I be sent to hell for mortal sins I did not confess through the means of the Catholic church? (Lisa)
ReplyDeleteLisa- This is an excellent question, and one that I have dealt with on numerous occassions, seeing as my mother and husband are both Protestants.
ReplyDeleteFrom what I understand of Church teaching mortal sin requires either absolution in sacramental reconcilliation OR complete repentence on the part of the sinner. So, if you have completely turned away from mortal sin, with God's help, then I believe it is the same thing as having gone to confession.
The reason Catholics cling so to our sacrament of confession is that we believe God bestows grace upon us in our absolution to help us turn away from sin in the future... So, let's say I confess sexual immorality in Reconcilliation; God grants me the grace to overcome committing the same sins again in the future if my heart is open receiving that grace, along with absolution. (Right attitude is essential for receiving the grace granted in ANY sacrament; you can't just go tell it to the priest and think that everything's taken care of; actual contrition is a requirement for Confession.)
So, if you have committed mortal sin, are truly contrite, have confessed it (and I would recommend also confessing to a brother or sister in Christ, if not to a priest, as it is a real test of our humility and genuine repentance to confess aloud to someone else), have prayed for forgiveness, and have been changed by God's grace so that you have been able to turn away completely from that sin, then I would say you have received your absolution. Hope that helps.
~Bethany
I should clarify my last comment a moment: Sacramental confession remains the only "ordinary way" for the faithful to reconcile themselves with the Church and with God, according to the RCC. When it is impossible to confess to a priest for physical or moral reasons, then true repentance can suffice, but only in such cases.
ReplyDelete~Bethany
Lisa again. Your clarification is confusing. Does it mean that I must confess my mortal sins to a priest unless I physically or morally can't or else I am unforgiven and hell-bound? As a Protestant, Christ is my high priest, and if you read almost any book of Hebrews you will see that mentioned and defined a lot. Specifically Hebrews 7:25-27. How do I reconcile that with the teaching of the Catholic church. To me, when tradition (and don't doubt Protestants embrace traditions themselves) and the Bible conflict, I believe that God's Word trumps.
ReplyDeleteLisa- While I understand that you read Scripture differently, please understand that we Catholics do not follow Sacred Tradition in lieu of Scripture; we do not see them to be contradictory but rather complementary and both essential to our understanding of God and His Will.
ReplyDeleteI am sorry if my response was confusing. As I understand it, your moral reasons for deeming sacramental confession to be unnecessary would be grounds for not seeking sacramental confession. I meant to clarify that Catholics are not permitted to seek absolution outside of the Church. The sacrament is not meant to be set aside by the faithful simply because other faiths do not accept or agree with the sacrament and may be able to seek absolution apart from it. You would, however, still be required to make an act of perfection contrition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_contrition
Of course, I'm no expert in canon law. If you are truly concerned about the topic, I would advise you to contact a local priest and pose your question to him.
~Bethany
Bethany, with all the resources out there tell me you didn't just quote Wikipedia! Anyway, I agree with Lisa. If I have confessed my sin to the Lord, prayed for forgiveness, and in all ways plan to not commit the sin again (although humans are weak and it could happen), then I figure I've done what I need to. Of course, I'm referring to the venial sins. If it's a mortal sin, I assume there is a great deal more to the atonement.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous - I'm not sure if you're referring to Purgatory or to the necessity of Sacramental Confession in your comment. I could write a whole 'nother post about that topic...maybe I will one day, and obviously, I haven't fleshed it out well just in these comments. It seemed like you were referring to this latter topic, so let me just say briefly that Catholics are only required to go to Confession for mortal sins, though they are encouraged to confess venial sin, as well. We believe that reparation needs to be made for all sins (though Jesus is our complete atonement). So, what you have listed is a spot-on way to repent for venial sins, apart from making reparation, which you have omitted. And, Catholics would likely also choose to go to Confession in order to receive God's grace to help them resist the temptation to sin in the future.
ReplyDeleteAgain, the point of this post is not to convince people of the existence of Purgatory or not but merely to inform those who are confused about what it is of the Catholic understanding of this dogma.
~ Bethany
PS And, I only quoted Wikipedia because it was so nice and concise in this instance, as opposed to some of the more verbose theological sites :)
I didn't know that the Jews at the time of Jesus believed that Gehenna was a temporary place of purification. I do wonder at the eternal burning in hell that some Christians see as the only alternative to (their brand of) Christianity.
ReplyDelete